Per-gigabyte licensing makes your best customers your worst accounts. Flat pricing changes what you can profitably offer.
A managed provider reselling volume-priced licensing has a structural problem: the customer who grows becomes a margin problem, and the only levers are reducing what you collect or repricing the account.
CAVER's flat per-deployment license removes that. It also makes a deployment per client affordable, which is the cleanest possible answer to the data isolation question every procurement now asks.
Most of these are economic rather than technical, which is why more features have not solved them.
CAVER charges a flat fee per deployment. There is no charge per gigabyte.
That is a pricing decision, but it only works because of how the system is built. On a storage lake, what a search costs depends on how many files it opens, not how many bytes you have kept. CAVER continuously merges small files into fewer, larger, sorted ones.
On a real production system running about 100GB a day, that change did two things:
Older data moves to a sealed tier that is simply a folder. Months outside your search window are never opened at all. There is no separate index to rebuild before a search or an alert can reach that folder: detections and dashboards query it directly, measured at 172 milliseconds for an alert and 76 milliseconds for a dashboard panel over a million events.
What this means for you: "how far back can I search" becomes a storage question, not a performance question. You stop choosing between logging whatever each client actually needs logged and staying inside budget.
A deployment per client, operated from one place.
A deployment per client is the strongest isolation and what we recommend. For smaller clients, a shared deployment scopes ingest tokens, indexes, behavior models, notables and ChatOps by tenant, delivered on request, typically within 30 days of order. Multi-tenant management of endpoint fleets through the Carbide Console is available to design partners. The flat license is what makes a deployment per client affordable.
What your analysts and your clients actually touch.
The reason teams turn detections off is not that the detections are wrong. It is that nobody is left to work the output.
Roughly a third of alerts are never investigated, an investigation takes over an hour, and an analyst closes twenty to thirty in a shift. A three-digit queue does not fit inside a staffed team by arithmetic. So CAVER ships named workers rather than more alerts: each one holds a single job, runs it on its own beat, and reports what it found.
An agent that speaks only when it finds something is indistinguishable from one that is broken, and the second is far more common than anyone admits. Every run is written down whether or not it found anything, carrying what it checked and over what window. A quiet morning becomes evidence rather than an absence of evidence.
Twenty of the thirty-six are rules, joins and thresholds: the same data gives the same answer on any day, and it can be explained to an auditor as a query. The other sixteen are baselines, peer groups and rarity, which is still arithmetic over your own history. Five can use a language model to write their summary in prose; turn it off and you lose the wording, not the finding.
The platform roster is per tenant, and so is the on-off decision, so a customer who wants none of it and a customer who wants all of it are the same deployment.
Every agent ships disabled, and you enable them one at a time from the product. That is deliberate. You decide what runs for whom, and the run history is per tenant and exportable.
The workforce, the roster and the controls are shipped and in the product. The connections that feed individual agents land per data source, so an agent whose source is not connected yet says exactly that and names what it needs, rather than reporting a confident nothing. Ask us which of the thirty-six are live against your feeds before you count on any one of them.
Most estates buy endpoint telemetry from somewhere, and CAVER reads what you already run: CrowdStrike, Defender, SentinelOne, Sysmon, syslog and the forwarders on your servers. For the hosts where the options are bad, CAVER ships its own agent, Carbide, at no extra charge.
Sysmon process, network, file, registry, module-load, DNS and memory events all arrive as OCSF with the parent and child identifiers carried in the event, so a chain of executions joins across hosts rather than only inside one log line. A coverage screen shows which Event IDs are arriving now, which were seen in the last week and not in the last day, and which hosts are reporting. Every freshness figure is the time of the last event, never a count, because a count is satisfied by history: a source that died last week still has a large one.
| Same host, same workload | Kernel capture | Polling |
|---|---|---|
| 300 short-lived processes in a loop | 300 captured | 0 captured |
That row is why the agent exists. A process that starts and exits between two polls is most of what execution telemetry is for, and a poller cannot see it.
Carbide ships for Linux, Windows and macOS, installed as a system service. AIX coverage is available to design partners. Where you already run CrowdStrike, Defender or SentinelOne, Carbide sits beside it or CAVER reads that instead. Sysmon process, network, file, registry, module-load, DNS and memory events are all normalized to OCSF and addressed by the same detection content.
A vulnerability list ranked by severity score tells you what could be exploited. Two public feeds tell you what is.
CAVER ingests CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, about 1,200 CVEs with confirmed exploitation, and FIRST's EPSS scores, an exploitation probability for roughly 200,000 CVEs, every day, and joins both onto your findings by CVE. The vulnerability screen gains an exploited-in-the-wild filter and a sortable probability column.
The effect on a real board is the difference between "4,000 findings" and "these eleven are being exploited right now, start here".
In 2026 CISA published an advisory in which two organizations faced the same red team with the same tradecraft and both fell to full domain compromise. One isolated three phished workstations in 10, 2 and 20 minutes and cut the command channel. The other actioned zero alerts. The difference was not the tooling and not the detection content; it was how fast a person acted on what the tooling already knew.
So CAVER measures that interval, per incident, from the case record:
We publish compression and query speed as first-class numbers because they are how CAVER beats a per-gigabyte platform. Time to contain is the number that decides whether any of that mattered, and it is on the same screen.
Real measurements from a production system handling about 100GB per day.
| Search | Time |
|---|---|
| Empty hour | 6 ms |
| One hour of data | 38 ms |
| 24 hours of data | 453 ms |
| 48 hours across two data centers | 627 ms |
Published figures show searches under 50 ms at the 95th percentile. The counterpart matters just as much: a 120-second ceiling still applies to large summarized searches, and searches over recent data under load run around 1.1 to 1.2 seconds. We are working on that ceiling. Both numbers are published because a best case is not a guarantee.
Ask any vendor, including us, for the range across your own data types during a trial. Not just one blended figure.
| Area | Typical SIEM | CAVER |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Per gigabyte; retention becomes a budget lever | Flat per deployment |
| Data ownership | Often vendor-hosted, proprietary format | Your storage, your keys, open format |
| Archived data access | A restore or rehydration job, often billed per query | Queried directly from your own bucket, no restore step |
| Encryption at rest | Assumed, rarely verified | Checked before start; refuses to run on storage it cannot confirm |
| Client isolation | Shared tenancy with logical separation | A deployment per client, centrally managed, or a shared deployment scoped by tenant |
| Fleet configuration | Manual, or a shared clone with no versioning | Label-selected bundles with canary rollout |
| Your existing detection content | A rewrite, or left behind | Sigma, Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel, QRadar and Defender rules convert in, with a report on what did not |
| Evidence handling | Export logs; chain of custody is manual | Cryptographic custody, verifiable offline |
| Compliance reporting | Usually a separate product | More than 20 frameworks built in, signed export |
| Where it runs | Many are cloud only | Cloud, on-premise, air-gapped, single box |
An established SIEM has real advantages we will not pretend away:
Those are genuine switching costs. Our answer is the parallel-run and collector-only options above, which let you measure the difference instead of taking it on faith.
For the moment an incident becomes a legal, regulatory or contractual matter.
At that point someone outside your security team needs to trust the record without trusting your vendor. The Evidence Locker is built for that:
What this means for you: a record you can hand a client's regulator or insurer without them having to trust you or us.
The AES-256 password protects the contents of the archive. The list of file names and their sizes is still readable without the password, which is how the ZIP format works. If a file name would itself reveal something, rename it before export.
One product, not a different tool for every environment.
CAVER runs on Kubernetes, a virtual machine, an isolated network, or a single box. License activation does not need an internet connection, and a lapsed license gives you a 14-day grace period rather than shutting off mid-incident.
This is your risk decision. Both are real products. Neither is a discouraged version of the other.
SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect are both configured in the product: paste or fetch your identity provider's SAML metadata, or point at your OIDC issuer for discovery, then map the attributes or claims to roles. Test against the live provider before you can turn it on: enable is refused without a successful test in the last 24 hours. A saved change or a disable takes effect on the next request, no restart, and local login stays reachable so an identity-provider outage cannot lock your operators out. An OIDC client secret is sealed in the product's credential vault, never stored in the clear.
SCIM provisioning is configured the same way: an operator mints a bearer token for the identity provider, shown once and stored only as a hash, revoked on the very next request rather than the next restart. Group membership from SAML, OIDC, or SCIM maps to roles by the same rule.
The same connectivity for every client, so onboarding is configuration rather than a project.
| Category | How it reaches CAVER | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Network and security | Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cisco, Juniper, Check Point, Zscaler, Cloudflare | Ready-made packs |
| Endpoint | CrowdStrike, Defender, SentinelOne, Carbon Black, Trellix, Huntress, Sophos, Sysmon | Ready-made packs |
| Proofpoint, Mimecast, Abnormal | Ready-made packs | |
| Identity | Entra, Okta, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Auth0, Ping, Duo, Active Directory | Ready-made packs |
| Cloud | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Ready-made packs |
| Ingest paths | Syslog, Kafka and Event Hubs, Kinesis Firehose, S3 and SQS, OTLP, Prometheus remote_write, NetFlow, sFlow, SNMP, and agentless Windows Event Forwarding over HTTPS with no collector box at small sites | Included |
| Carbide, our own endpoint agent | Kernel-level process telemetry on Linux, Windows and macOS, shipped to CAVER directly | Included; AIX for design partners |
| Industrial equipment | More than a dozen industrial protocols decoded passively from mirrored traffic | Included, no extra product |
| Zeek, Suricata, wireless and physical | Zeek and Suricata logs normalized to OCSF; Cisco WLC, Aruba, Mist and Ruckus ingest with rogue-AP detection; weapons-detection connectors | Delivered on request |
| Further adapters | SentinelOne alerts and Ranger, Carbon Black App Control, Tenable OT, Armis, Snowflake query history, Trend Cloud One, PingOne, Cognito, Identity Center and CloudWatch Logs pull, plus direct LDAP, Entra and Okta user polling | Delivered on request |
| AI tools | Microsoft Agent 365 event data, plus Claude, Copilot, OpenAI and others | 24 packs, 200+ rules |
More than 400 ready-made vendor packs ship for the common systems, so the bespoke work is the exception rather than the starting point.
A trial is 60 days, $25K to $75K, credited fully toward your first year if you proceed. If you are replacing Splunk, a displacement credit of 25% to 50% off year one is available separately.
Do not take this paper on faith. Test it directly: