REDEYE CYBERSECURITY · ENGINEERED
White paper · CAVER for Water & Wastewater
CAVER for Water & Wastewater

A vital service, on a budget that was never meant for this

Small teams, aging control systems, federal expectations that keep rising, and funding that arrives through programs rather than operating budget.

Date October 2026 Prepared by RedEye Security

Executive summary

Water and wastewater utilities are named critical infrastructure with the staffing of a small business. The control estate predates the requirements now written about it, and replacing it is a capital project that cannot start this year.

CAVER decodes the protocols those systems actually run, passively and with no agent on any controller. It proves when a process cannot meet its target, which for a water system is the difference between a full tank and an empty one nobody predicted. It runs on one box, air-gapped, at a flat price.

The industrial detail here is the same as our plant paper; what differs is the funding routes and the staffing reality.

Contents
01

The position utilities are in

None of this is a failure of diligence either. It is what happens when obligations grow faster than rate-funded budgets.

  • You are a named critical infrastructure sector with the staffing of a small business.
  • Your SCADA estate predates the requirements being written about it.
  • Assessments produce a document, not monitoring, and the document is stale within a quarter.
  • Per-gigabyte pricing is impossible against a rate-payer funded budget.
  • You need evidence for a funding application, not just a dashboard.
02

What changed in 2026

Three things happened in August and September 2026 that every water operator should read, because together they say out loud what the budget has been telling you to ignore.

  • Project Watershed 250. On August 31 the White House launched a six-month pilot that puts red teams inside Texas water utilities at no cost to the utility, with EPA and CISA federally, Texas Cyber Command at state level, and the stated intent to expand nationally. Officials said it was not a response to a specific breach while citing attacks on more than thirty Minnesota water systems. The threats are active and documented, and they fall hardest on small utilities with no security staff.
  • Iranian attempts against water, telecommunications and energy. Reported in September as unsuccessful. That word is doing more work than it looks: the previous Iranian-linked campaign to reach US water, against internet-exposed controllers in late 2023, did not fail and did not need a zero-day. It needed the default password still set. Nothing in the new reporting says that class of target stopped existing.
  • The CISA Logging Reference Architecture. Published August 20, implementing OMB memorandum M-26-14. It shifts the question from "are you collecting logs" to "can you prove the collection still works", and it names the failure modes that make a healthy-looking estate useless. It is written for federal agencies and it is the clearest public statement yet of what good logging looks like for anyone.

The question those three add up to is the one worth answering before the free assessment arrives: if someone reached your HMI tonight, which log shows it, who reads that log, and how long would it take? The rest of this paper is our answer, and the CISA section further down is the checklist to hold us to.

Where to read more

We wrote each of these up as it happened at threat-intelligence.redeyesecurity.com, including what the reporting actually supports and what it does not.

03

Why the price works

CAVER charges a flat fee per deployment. There is no charge per gigabyte.

That is a pricing decision, but it only works because of how the system is built. On a storage lake, what a search costs depends on how many files it opens, not how many bytes you have kept. CAVER continuously merges small files into fewer, larger, sorted ones.

On a real production system running about 100GB a day, that change did two things:

Older data moves to a sealed tier that is simply a folder. Months outside your search window are never opened at all. There is no separate index to rebuild before a search or an alert can reach that folder: detections and dashboards query it directly, measured at 172 milliseconds for an alert and 76 milliseconds for a dashboard panel over a million events.

$0/GBNo ingest charge; flat per deployment
7 yearsAudit retention, enterprise tier
466 → 10Files opened per search, after merging
48:1Compression: raw log volume against what the lake stores

What this means for you: "how far back can I search" becomes a storage question, not a performance question. You stop choosing between logging the whole plant, including the parts nobody looks at and staying inside budget.

04

The finding that matters most here

A pump fills a 30,000 gallon tank at 11 gallons a minute, and the program runs it three hours a day.

  • Nothing is broken and no alarm fires.
  • 11 gallons a minute for three hours is 1,980 gallons a day.
  • The tank will never fill.

That is a fault in the goals rather than the equipment, and CAVER proves it by arithmetic while naming the binding constraint: the duty window, not the pump. One is a settings change and the other is a capital project, and knowing which is which is the whole value.

Units are carried and checked

A unit mismatch refuses to produce a verdict rather than coercing, because a confidently wrong number about a drinking-water system is worse than no number at all.

05

Nothing touches the control network

More than a dozen industrial protocols decoded from mirrored traffic or a capture file: Modbus/TCP, DNP3, EtherNet/IP (CIP), S7comm, BACnet/IP, IEC 60870-5-104, OPC UA, PROFINET, IEC 61850 GOOSE and MMS, IEEE C37.118 synchrophasor and ANSI C12.22 metering.

  • No agent on any controller. Nothing is installed on equipment you cannot take out of service.
  • No scanning. Active scanning of control equipment causes outages, and refusing to do it is the correct engineering position.
  • Two install modes. Read-only mode has no writes and no response actions; interactive mode adds signed, audited actions. You choose per site, and the network sensor stays passive in both.

CAVER reads Modbus register pairs, DNP3 objects, EtherNet/IP tag values, S7 reads and writes and BACnet properties, and identifies devices from answers already on the wire. Nothing is probed, so a PLC that cannot be touched is never touched.

It also acquires controller programs, diffs them semantically and flags a removed interlock or a changed setpoint block, so a program change reads as a change in behavior and not a changed binary. Siemens and Rockwell program import with change alerting is available on request, typically delivered within 30 days of order.

CAVER learns how your operators run the plant by shift and season, classifies a deviation as error, practice or attack, and shows staffing and competence drift. That is the case for a three-person water crew. Work orders from your CMMS are matched to control changes, so a contractor's approved valve change and an unapproved one read differently.

Account password-age fields arrive from every IT and OT identity source, so a shared operator account still on its original credential ranks at the top of a list instead of hiding in a spreadsheet. Shipped detections include Modbus register sweeps, DNP3 Direct Operate, deadband thrash, intermittent faults, machine-cadence breaks and attack paths from enterprise to ICS, including an OT jump host pack. CISA ICS advisories and KEV and EPSS scores feed the vulnerability screen, and advisories matched to your exact PLCs are available on request, typically within 30 days.

A simulated municipal water plant and a synthetic OT protocol feed ship with the product, so the screens, detections and compliance reports can be shown on your own laptop in the first week of a trial. An operational recorder and evidence bundles package an incident window for the state primacy agency, your insurer or counsel.

What works on day one, and what needs a baseline

Almost all of this works the day your data lands. One part does not, and it is worth being exact about which part, because the difference is usually explained badly.

That last point is the one that matters. "We found nothing" and "we are not ready yet" look identical on a screen, and only one of them is good news. A tool that does not distinguish them is quietly telling you that you are safe during the exact period it cannot tell.

06

Caver Industrial

The OT work has its own place in the product, because a plant engineer and a SOC analyst are not the same reader and should not be handed the same screen.

It is a place in the product with its own entry, its own landing page and its own screens, not a folder of dashboards filed between two vendors you have never heard of. A plant engineer opening this sees their process, not a security product with their protocol names pasted into it. Reports come as a signed, customer-branded PDF or CSV with the evidence rows behind each control, which is the attachment a funding reviewer asks for. Scheduled delivery to named recipients such as your board, state coordinator or insurer is available on request, typically within 30 days of order. For a utility the compliance screen is the one to open first: AWIA section 2013 and the CISA performance goals are on it, control by control, with what proves each one.

What is in it

What a screen shows when the data is not there

A panel whose field this deployment does not carry says so, by name, instead of drawing a zero. That distinction is not decoration: a zero means nobody did it and an absent field means we cannot tell, and a product that spells both of them the same way is quietly telling you that you are covered during the exact period it cannot see.

07

The plane the firewall cannot see

Rural control sites run on radio. A pump station reports back to the plant over an unlicensed 900 MHz SCADA radio, and that link sits before the firewall, before the VPN, outside every network segment, and off the internet entirely. Every control a site bought protects the wire. The radio is not on the wire.

So the softest way into a control process is often the one no security tool watches. Someone parks near the fence line with the same $25 receiver a hobbyist uses, listens to the traffic, and on most rural links reads it in the clear, because the radios were installed to move telemetry, not to keep a secret. Replaying or injecting a frame from there steps around the firewall, the VPN and the segmentation at once, and no exposure scanner will ever index a link that was never on the internet.

What CAVER watches for

A software-defined radio the size of a thumb drive, plugged into the Windows machine already sitting at the site, listens to the band and learns its normal picture: which radios are present, on which frequencies, at what strength, hopping in what pattern. From that learned baseline it reports the departures rather than a wall of raw signal:

Years of it, at a rounding-error cost

Watching a whole band around the clock sounds expensive to keep. It is not. The spectrum picture, the learned baseline and the departures together come to a few megabytes a day per site, because CAVER stores a compact snapshot and the events instead of a raw firehose. A site holds years of its own radio history and queries it the way it queries everything else, on storage it already owns.

And it lands where the plant already lives. A radio becomes an asset next to the controller it talks to, a departure becomes a detection on the same triage board as the wired alerts, and the link's health sits beside the process it carries. No platform that pairs a radio sensor to its own data store has drawn that picture, because no incumbent owns both halves.

What is running today, and the one limit that does not move

The Caver RF add-on runs this sensor continuously and streams to your deployment. Sweeps, learned baselines and departures land as OCSF events beside the wired traffic. Sub-GHz SCADA radio profiles are configured per site and are available to design partners. The limit that never moves: the sensor only listens, it never transmits. Where a link is encrypted, reading it needs your own radio key, which on your own site you already hold. Everything else is receive-only by design, which is what keeps an RF capability on the defensive side of the line.

08

Physical and logical, on one timeline

Most facilities run their physical security, badge access, door contacts, cameras, entirely apart from the cyber side. Caver takes the events those systems emit, not the raw video, into the same store as the network and identity record.

That is where the cross-silo detections live: a badge at a restricted door while that account is logged in elsewhere, a tailgate followed by a login from inside the room, a terminated worker whose badge and account are both used after the end date.

Events, not surveillance

Events and counts only, never the raw video, and never a face. Anything that identifies or tracks a specific person is off by default and governed, an explicit and audited choice, so the capability stays on the defensive side of the line.

09

Workers, not another alert queue

The reason teams turn detections off is not that the detections are wrong. It is that nobody is left to work the output.

Roughly a third of alerts are never investigated, an investigation takes over an hour, and an analyst closes twenty to thirty in a shift. A three-digit queue does not fit inside a staffed team by arithmetic. So CAVER ships named workers rather than more alerts: each one holds a single job, runs it on its own beat, and reports what it found.

36Named agents, none needing a model
0Of them need a language model
OffHow every one of them arrives

Silence is a result, and it is recorded

An agent that speaks only when it finds something is indistinguishable from one that is broken, and the second is far more common than anyone admits. Every run is written down whether or not it found anything, carrying what it checked and over what window. A quiet morning becomes evidence rather than an absence of evidence.

Why none of them needs a model

Twenty of the thirty-six are rules, joins and thresholds: the same data gives the same answer on any day, and it can be explained to an auditor as a query. The other sixteen are baselines, peer groups and rarity, which is still arithmetic over your own history. Five can use a language model to write their summary in prose; turn it off and you lose the wording, not the finding.

Six of them are for utility and industrial work: setpoint drift against a learned band, a change outside an approved window, the command chain behind an action, an integrator laptop, a device that has gone quiet, and load against forecast.

They arrive switched off, and you switch them on

Every agent ships disabled, and you enable them one at a time from the product. That is deliberate. A utility has to agree which of its own changes are routine before an agent starts reporting them.

What is finished and what is arriving

The workforce, the roster and the controls are shipped and in the product. The connections that feed individual agents land per data source, so an agent whose source is not connected yet says exactly that and names what it needs, rather than reporting a confident nothing. Ask us which of the thirty-six are live against your feeds before you count on any one of them.

10

Endpoint telemetry that says when it is blind

Most estates buy endpoint telemetry from somewhere, and CAVER reads what you already run: CrowdStrike, Defender, SentinelOne, Sysmon, syslog and the forwarders on your servers. For the hosts where the options are bad, CAVER ships its own agent, Carbide, at no extra charge.

Sysmon, read as process lineage

Sysmon process, network, file, registry, module-load, DNS and memory events all arrive as OCSF with the parent and child identifiers carried in the event, so a chain of executions joins across hosts rather than only inside one log line. A coverage screen shows which Event IDs are arriving now, which were seen in the last week and not in the last day, and which hosts are reporting. Every freshness figure is the time of the last event, never a count, because a count is satisfied by history: a source that died last week still has a large one.

Carbide, on Linux, Windows and macOS

Same host, same workloadKernel capturePolling
300 short-lived processes in a loop300 captured0 captured

That row is why the agent exists. A process that starts and exits between two polls is most of what execution telemetry is for, and a poller cannot see it.

Platforms and coverage

Carbide ships for Linux, Windows and macOS, installed as a system service. AIX coverage is available to design partners. Where you already run CrowdStrike, Defender or SentinelOne, Carbide sits beside it or CAVER reads that instead. Sysmon process, network, file, registry, module-load, DNS and memory events are all normalized to OCSF and addressed by the same detection content.

11

From exploited to contained

A vulnerability list ranked by severity score tells you what could be exploited. Two public feeds tell you what is.

CAVER ingests CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, about 1,200 CVEs with confirmed exploitation, and FIRST's EPSS scores, an exploitation probability for roughly 200,000 CVEs, every day, and joins both onto your findings by CVE. The vulnerability screen gains an exploited-in-the-wild filter and a sortable probability column.

The effect on a real board is the difference between "4,000 findings" and "these eleven are being exploited right now, start here".

Time to contain, measured

In 2026 CISA published an advisory in which two organizations faced the same red team with the same tradecraft and both fell to full domain compromise. One isolated three phished workstations in 10, 2 and 20 minutes and cut the command channel. The other actioned zero alerts. The difference was not the tooling and not the detection content; it was how fast a person acted on what the tooling already knew.

So CAVER measures that interval, per incident, from the case record:

We publish compression and query speed as first-class numbers because they are how CAVER beats a per-gigabyte platform. Time to contain is the number that decides whether any of that mattered, and it is on the same screen.

12

Speed and storage, measured

Real measurements from a production system handling about 100GB per day.

SearchTime
Empty hour6 ms
One hour of data38 ms
24 hours of data453 ms
48 hours across two data centers627 ms
Performance in context

Published figures show searches under 50 ms at the 95th percentile. The counterpart matters just as much: a 120-second ceiling still applies to large summarized searches, and searches over recent data under load run around 1.1 to 1.2 seconds. We are working on that ceiling. Both numbers are published because a best case is not a guarantee.

Compression: 48 to 1, and how we measured it

"If a vendor will not show you the method, the ratio is not a number. It is a claim."RedEye Security, published material

Ask any vendor, including us, for the range across your own data types during a trial. Not just one blended figure.

13

How CAVER compares

AreaTypical SIEMCAVER
PricingPer gigabyte; retention becomes a budget leverFlat per deployment
Data ownershipOften vendor-hosted, proprietary formatYour storage, your keys, open format
Archived data accessA restore or rehydration job, often billed per queryQueried directly from your own bucket, no restore step
Encryption at restAssumed, rarely verifiedChecked before start; refuses to run on storage it cannot confirm
Industrial protocolsUsually a separate product or noneMore than a dozen decoded natively, included
Deployment sizeCluster or cloudOne box, air-gapped, grace period rather than shutdown
Compliance evidenceA matrix of green ticksMore than 20 frameworks built in, signed export, AWIA and the CISA performance goals first, gaps printed
Your existing detection contentA rewrite, or left behindSigma, Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel, QRadar and Defender rules convert in, with a report on what did not
Evidence handlingExport logs; chain of custody is manualCryptographic custody, verifiable offline
Compliance reportingUsually a separate productMore than 20 frameworks built in, signed export
Where it runsMany are cloud onlyCloud, on-premise, air-gapped, single box

Where the incumbents still win

An established SIEM has real advantages we will not pretend away:

Those are genuine switching costs. Our answer is the parallel-run and collector-only options above, which let you measure the difference instead of taking it on faith.

14

Read against the CISA Logging Reference Architecture

In August 2026 CISA published a Logging Reference Architecture implementing OMB memorandum M-26-14. It is not a list of sources to collect. It asks whether a logging capability can be shown to still be working, and it names the failure modes that make a healthy-looking estate useless.

"A logging capability that lacks validation of operational functions cannot be considered reliable."CISA Logging Reference Architecture, section 4.7
CISA asks forCAVER
4.7 Detect coverage gaps and delivery failures even when systems appear to be functioningA source that goes quiet is a finding, not a quiet week. Agents heartbeat on the channel they ship on, and the coverage screens report last-seen time per source rather than a count.
6.2.5 Endpoint records with process context rich enough for lateral-movement analysis and timeline reconstructionProcess lineage is part of the event contract, from Sysmon and from Carbide, so a chain joins across event types.
7.1, 7.2 Durable normalization, with source-native context preservedThe raw event is kept and the normalized class is a layer over it, applied on the way in. Every event names the normalizer and version that produced its view.
8.2 Integrity at collection, in transport, in storage and during accessThe Evidence Locker: hashed on arrival, an append-only transparency ledger, signed export, verifiable offline by someone who does not trust us.
4.5 Separate actively searchable data from lower-cost retrievable tiers, and decide how long each stays searchableSet per index, and re-measured in the product. 48:1 compression (raw log volume against what the lake stores) is what decides whether the answer is a year or ninety days.

The full mapping, in CISA's numbering, is at getcaver.com/cisa-logging. The most useful version of the conversation is section by section against your estate, including the parts where the answer is that you have work to do.

What this is not

It is a reading of a public document against a product, done by the product's vendor. It is not an endorsement, a certification or a relationship with CISA, and nothing here should be read as one.

15

Evidence that holds up

For the moment an incident becomes a legal, regulatory or contractual matter.

At that point someone outside your security team needs to trust the record without trusting your vendor. The Evidence Locker is built for that:

What this means for you: a record that supports a funding application or a regulatory conversation, verifiable without us. Evidence Locker objects can sit under S3 Object Lock (WORM) with dual-authorized legal hold and an independent verification command. Retention is set per data class, with legal hold, and ages on the ingest time CAVER stamped.

One limit worth knowing before you send a bundle

The AES-256 password protects the contents of the archive. The list of file names and their sizes is still readable without the password, which is how the ZIP format works. If a file name would itself reveal something, rename it before export.

16

Where it runs

One product, not a different tool for every environment.

CAVER runs on Kubernetes, a virtual machine, an isolated network, or a single box. License activation does not need an internet connection, and a lapsed license gives you a 14-day grace period rather than shutting off mid-incident.

Two postures, and you choose

This is your risk decision. Both are real products. Neither is a discouraged version of the other.

Signing in with what you already have

SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect are both configured in the product: paste or fetch your identity provider's SAML metadata, or point at your OIDC issuer for discovery, then map the attributes or claims to roles. Test against the live provider before you can turn it on: enable is refused without a successful test in the last 24 hours. A saved change or a disable takes effect on the next request, no restart, and local login stays reachable so an identity-provider outage cannot lock your operators out. An OIDC client secret is sealed in the product's credential vault, never stored in the clear.

Provisioning through SCIM

SCIM provisioning is configured the same way: an operator mints a bearer token for the identity provider, shown once and stored only as a hash, revoked on the very next request rather than the next restart. Group membership from SAML, OIDC, or SCIM maps to roles by the same rule.

Four ways to start

17

What CAVER connects to

Nothing requires an agent, and nothing scans.

CategoryHow it reaches CAVERStatus
SCADA and control systemsMore than a dozen protocols decoded passivelyIncluded
Existing OT security productsDragos, Claroty, Nozomi, Armis, Forescout, Radiflow, Tenable OT and Defender for IoT feed in alongsideSupported
Historians and HMIsTheir own logs, plus process history from any SQL historianReady-made packs
Business ITThe same platform, so both are searchable together. A Windows domain and a firewall are enough: agentless Windows Event Forwarding, syslog, NetFlow and SNMPMore than 400 vendor packs

And everything else

More than 400 ready-made vendor packs ship for the common systems, so the bespoke work is the exception rather than the starting point.

18

How to test our claims

A trial is 60 days, $25K to $75K, credited fully toward your first year if you proceed. If you are replacing Splunk, a displacement credit of 25% to 50% off year one is available separately.

Do not take this paper on faith. Test it directly:

  1. Run the four-phase assessment on the real plant. Discovery and inventory, passive baselining, a threat hunt, and a vulnerability review.
  2. Give us one process with a target and a schedule and have CAVER tell you whether it can meet it.
  3. Ask what CAVER shows during the learning period. It should tell you it is not ready, not show you a clean dashboard. This is the claim that is easiest to fake.
  4. Verify an evidence export yourself. Run our offline checker against a real export without touching the CAVER console.
  5. Ask for the compression range across your data types, and for the load ceiling next to any speed figure.
  6. Run it alongside your current SIEM so migration risk is measured during the trial rather than assumed afterward.
19

Where the money usually comes from

For utilities funding OT security through federal programs, assessment deliverables map to the routes commonly used:

  • AWIA section 2013 risk and resilience requirements.
  • State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP).
  • Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (CWSRF, DWSRF).
  • FEMA Homeland Security Grant Program, and IIJA allocations.
What we can and cannot do here

We produce the assessment and the evidence. Eligibility is determined by the program and your state, not by us, and we do not write your application. Ask us for the deliverables; ask your state's coordinator whether they qualify.